New Tectonics 2016 Revised (IV) [Updated with texts]

New Tectonics 2016 Revised (IV) [Updated with texts]

I am currently performing some maintenance task in my computer, besides, I will try to manage my website a bit from the metadata point of view, in order to solve some navigation, display, and other types of things related to HTML, CSS, Javascript, and other programing languages.

So, I will delay a bit in publishing from post to post. Besides, I have a lot more analysis and information in my papers, and this is what today’s post is about: my papers.

I wrote, observed, calculated, made drawings by hand about all these topics I have been writing about in my blog. These images I’ll upload today, are scans of some of my papers. I’ll upload and will make some comments below each image.

(Beware of little errors and/or typoes I corrected one in (2) papersheet).

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 01

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 01

This image above is the image I published last year without texts.

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 02

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 02

This image above is a sketch to situate some massive extinction events (of which I think I already wrote about). The land names have a number on their right, it is for years. There is also a world map I drawn with a pencil with an indication for the less known places. Their distribution indicates a correlation with latitudes and longitudes, being the most significative those of Tasmania, bridge between Tasmania and Australia, and Australia. These three pieces of land were, according to my theory deep under India Peninsula, and that is why they seem older than they are, along with their location of one of the magnetic old-known dipole field poles.

However, there are some places which do not seem to comply with this, but this is because they had thousands of years ago, other latitude and longitude values, along with the rotation axis displacement throughout the centuries, and our human-like way of representing in our minds, spherical surfaces and volumes, as planes, despite the fact that they are not planes at all.

In the top area of the image above, there is a brief sketch on Earth-Moon two-body system, its barycenter, and the relation between the Earth’s core (LITOS) and the height of Kosciuco (KOSCI), the highest peak in Australian island. There is also an indication (not complying with the real value) on how the rotation axis varied during the Moon’s ejection out od the Earth’s core process.

This is a brief analysis on the emerged lands surface and the radius of the Earth being considered as a half of what it is today, along with some percentages of iron and nickel (among others) concentrations considered as a ‘crystal’ ( a crystal has a regular exactly repeated pattern in the 3D space, forming a three-dimensional lattice), although metallic elements are not considered as pure crystals, because of their electromagnetic properties among other reasons: the ‘share’ a cloud of electrons all along their mass, which is something a crystal does not do, but in terms of volumes, surfaces, lengths, and generally speaking, spatial dimensions, they are also ordered as crystals.

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 03

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 031 (that is why the caption changed)

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 04


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 04

This image above is a proportional representation on concentrations for elements and their atomic radiuses.

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 05


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 05

The image above is a more detailed sketch on the same relationships.

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 06


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 06

A basic sketch about some lands on a sphere.

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 07


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 07

If you print this one above and make the bottom edge coincide with the dashed line on top you can rotate a cylinder with some pieces of land placed on it.

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 08

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 08

I will include the translation for the handwritten texts in capital letters in these images below.

The last handwritten text pages (I’ll re-read them and comment at the bottom the most important ideas) are already posted in English last year, might be some inacuracies because I wrote them last year more or less this time.

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 09


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 09

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 09:

On top of this image there is a name for an island: Greenland. There are two arrows, one of them is pushing upward from below another curved line (the planet’s surface), the other arrow indicates that it turned upside down, just as pancakes do while cooking.

The drawing right below indicates the situation for Hayes Peninsula, which is currently in West Greenland, but then was turned the other way, so it fitted into Barents Sea, where Kola, and Kanin Peninsulas along with Kolgujen Island (near New Zemlya Island) are. I also indicated there Iceland’s situation then (“Islandia”). All these pieces of above sea level lands, fitted into Hudson Bay in North America.

[(While turning upside down) Greenland pulled today’s North America and Europe lands]

(Greenland) fell upon (today’s) Canadian Northern islands, pushing New Zemlya under Scandinavian Peninsula toward the North-East. The core’s zone which decayed then was sticked to Greenland, Greenland Sea, Gakel Ridge, and marine seabeds of the North Pole, leaving hence all the enclosing split and its surface shifted.

Iceland did not turn, but moved toward the South-West, North America toward the West.

Labrador Peninsula was upon the Baltic Sea, Finland, Baltic Republics, Belaruss, Russia (Kaliningrad), Poland and Germany.

Plymouth was then situated next to Hamburg on the North.

Denmark was between Great Britain and Ireland (Scotland was then next to Oslo on the South).

[You know? Translating is a process which makes me aware of others not understanding properly what I explain, so this translation is perhaps much more informative than the original handwritten texts 🙂 ].

The Netherlands, France, and Central Europe were swivelled 90 arc degrees then respect their today’s positions, so the Carpathians  were situated in West Hudson Bay (then) joined to the ridge between Norway and Sweeden, which were also there and next to Labrador Peninsula on the North-West.

While turning toward South-East, the Carpathian Mountains pushed Italia Peninsula, Corsica, Sardinia and Sicily that (bearing in mind the ‘lengthening’ due to Mercator projection while getting from 40º latitude to 60º latitude) were then next to Labrador Peninsula in Hudson Strait, and also on the Ungava (North-West Labrador) Peninsula Depressions, getting all these pieces of land out of their fittings, and forming the Alps in the process.

Iberian Peninsula (Spain, and Portugal): it is a microplate, it is not part of Europe as a whole, geologically speaking, this is known by all geologists in the world, the Pyrenee Ridge is its mountainous edge on the North-East. Iberian Peninsula was then next to Newfoundland and both got apart from North-East Labrador Peninsula.

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 10

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 10

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 10:

Ukrain was under and on the South of Labrador Peninsula, part of it was covered by the Carpathina Mountains.

Yucatan (Mexico), was East of Greece, which along with Albania, Macedonia, Part of Bulgaria, and European Turkey were into Mexican Gulf.

Cuba (you just compare the coast in North Turkey, with the shape of Cuba Island, and their soils and strata) was next to Turkey on the North (Middle East).

The Caucasus Mountains were formed while crushing against the Urals, shifting them North-East, movement which ended splitting New Zemlya , Scandinavia, Iceland, British Islands, Ireland, and Denmark apart.

While the Urals were being displaced by the Caucasus Mountains, the Siberian Plain and Depression were formed, pushing the Central Siberian Plateau toward the East and forming the East Siberian Ridges and the Aleutian Islands Arc (along with Comander Islands).

Kamchatka Peninsula (North-East Russian Coast), swirled upside down (‘pancake mode’ 🙂 ) getting apart from Sakhalin Island (which was then inside California Gulf) and South-East ward the Sea of Okhostk. Sakhalin Island is on the Mariane Fault, which runs all along the East Pacific Coast (West of Eurasia), passing through Japan, where that geological line intercepts the  one running from Kamchatka to Cambodya.

Australia was stuck under Indian Ocean, next to South-East India Peninsula, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Tahiland, Cambodya, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Australia got split from its under deep encasing in the same direction than the Urals when the Caucasus pushed East-ward and crashed against Hymalaya, emerging, and leaving behind Malaysia and Indonesia on its way, untill it crashed against the Great Coral Barrier and its, on Australian land, elongation, the Dividing Range.

South America, pushed by Australia, got apart East-ward and ‘flying’ a bit upon New Zealand. New Zealand remained more or less where it was (then fit into River Plate, compare their shapes, dimensions, soils composition and strata, inverting layers order upside down in some cases, you will see it was so).

Antarctica was then turned, fitting Southafrica into its bay.

Madagascar was upside down and between the North of Australia and the West of Tahiland.

Hawaii (and most Oceania above sea level lands) was formed in the wake of the ejection of part of the Earth’s inner core while all this movements I explained took place (that part of the core’s ejection is our satellite: the Moon).

You can think the movements the other way around, but it does not matter very much (well… it does matter, in terms of calculating inertia, and direction for movements, although in terms of stablishing a new way of understanding tectonics, not as they were understood untill now: every piece of land splitting and drifting softly and steadily apart from Pangaea, it is not so important)  if it was America moving East-ward while getting apart from Eurafroaustralasia (Europe+Africa+Australia+Asia), or if it was Eurafroaustralasia moving West-ward during the same process (this can be determined by the circumference like lines in some ridges near Bering Strait), the important thing is, tectonics thought this way, explain many inconsistencies, that traditional tectonics don’t do.

This is why I started writing about this.

[To be (dis) continued… tomorrow, and after tomorrow following days]

Here downward there is a handwritten text in Spanish, for which I have already commented the most relevant things in a post last year.

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 11

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 11

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 12

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 12

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 13

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 13

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 14

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 14

 New Tectonics 2016 Revised 15


New Tectonics 2016 Revised 15

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 16

New Tectonics 2016 Revised 16

And that’s all for now.

Acerca de María Cristina Alonso Cuervo

I am a teacher of English who started to write this blog in May 2014. In the column on the right I included some useful links and widgets Italian is another section of my blog which I called 'Cornice Italiana'. There are various tags and categories you can pick from. I also paint, compose, and play music, I always liked science, nature, arts, language... and other subjects which you can come across while reading my posts. Best regards.
Galería | Esta entrada fue publicada en Communication and languages, English, Environment, Español, Global issues, Paintings, Physics Chemistry and Mathematics, Science, Seismicity, Tectonics y etiquetada , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Guarda el enlace permanente.